Hoes.com Porn Site Reviews

Home Porn Site Reviews Porn Movies Amateur Girls Fetishes Gay Sex Concierge Hot Deals

Reviews Menu: Reviews Home Hoes.com Concierge We find sites for you. Try it! Exclusive Discounts Only Available At Hoes.com. Top Rated Fine Babes Sites Met Art 92.9 1 By Day 92.5 FTV Girls 92.2 Pix And Video 92.1 Digital Desire 92.0 Twisty's 91.9 MC Nudes 91.8 Hegre Art 91.3 Viv Thomas 89.6 Euro Foxes 87.9 Errotica Archives 87.8 Club Sandy 87.0

Penthouse.com Review Listed: 10/02/2007    Updated: 10/04/2007 Overview: If you like the magazine (and who doesn't) you'll enjoy their website even more. Hundreds of the hottest models getting naked, getting fucked, or getting it on with one another. There's a whole lot to see in here and all of it is wicked hot.( Full Review )   Visit Site Now Cost Details: Monthly: $24.95 Other Options: 1 Year-month: $119.40 Categories: Fine Babes (main), Glamour Movies: Quantity: 317+ Movies Avg. Length: 18 Minutes Formats: WMV Bit Rates: 520Kbps, 270Kbps Delivery: Downloadable, Streaming Screen Caps: No Exclusive: No Restrictions: DRM Photos: Quantity: 1,654+ Galleries Zip Files: No Exclusive: No Updates: Daily Billing Methods:  Credit Card, Check, Mail Extras: 3rd Party Photos, Chat, Cams, Video Feeds, Stories

Site Owner: Penthouse Partners Click To List Sites Webmasters: Promote Penthouse.com Info Links: Member Support 2257 Records

Penthouse.com Free Sample Galleries

Gallery 1 View It   Gallery 2 View It   Gallery 3 View It

Note: These sample galleries are randomly selected and only show a tiny bit of what the site has to offer.

Penthouse.com Full Review The same magazine that's been entertaining us with glamorous pic sets of gorgeous slut after gorgeous slut for all these years makes the same quality goods found in their magazines available in both picture format and video format in an easy to navigate website. The reason I've always been a huge fan of Penthouse is probably for the same reason that you've always been a fan; the models aren't afraid to show their slutty side, unlike other glamour publications. You can browse the content made available by Pet, model, pic gallery, and video. They even provide the highly read columns that the magazine has always provided; "Forum Letters", "Ask Dr. Z", and "X-Rated Video Reviews". The Pets are organized by month and year with all the content for each pet available inside their own little personal site. You can go all the way back to '73 if you're into retro shit. Viewing the pic sets of the Pets is made easy with a slideshow, five different photo resolutions for the more recent sets, and a zoom in/zoom out feature that flat out fucking rocks. Choose the 4000k file and zoom out for incredible picture quality. The model section isn't as easy to browse with only the name of the model made available. If you don't know a model's name, good luck finding her. The gallery section is organized by niche; Pets, models, girl-girl, couples, and group sex. Notice how they have online exclusives mixed in with the magazine stuff? Love that shit! I have some browsing ideas that aren't in place that would make getting around the picture sets a much more enjoyable experience, but for now, you can only really browse by model and by niche. The video section is where things start to go down hill fast, but what do you expect from a site that's produced by an adult pictorial magazine? However, if they wanted to attract more members, they need to start showing their video section some love. The resolution is simply not good, browsing the content is no fun, and there's a serious lack of download options.   Visit Site Now

The Good The site provides everything the magazine does plus more. Online exclusive content. Tons of high-quality picture sets to see. The Bad Video section is definately not their strong suit. Browsing the content could be made easier. Bottom Line If you like the magazine, you'll flip over the website with the content quality as good as, if not better than what the magazine provides. The online exclusive content is killer. The video section is not.